|
FONTANA-The Geneva Lake
Conservancy hopes a property owner survey in the Geneva
Lake watershed will help policymakers and builders make
development decisions.
Jim Celano, conservancy
director, said policymakers must realize that decisions
they make affect local natural resources, such as groundwater
and open land.
What still must be determined
is the impact of development on Geneva Lake, Celano said.
Right now, no one knows the tipping point between ecology
and economy, he said.
The conservancy commissioned
UW-Whitewater's Fiscal and Economic Research Center to survey
watershed residents between September and December 2006.
The goal was to determine the economic impact of Geneva
Lake and residents' attitudes toward the lake.
Geneva Lake's watershed
hugs the shoreline. Most of Lake Geneva and almost all of
Walworth are outside the watershed, as is part of Fontana
and as much as a third of Linn Township.
UW-Whitewater economics
professors Russ Kashian, Mark Eiswerth and Mark Skidmore,
who is chairman of the department, discussed the survey
results at a press conference Monday at the conservancy
offices in Fontana. Some results had been released in March.
About 1,600 surveys went
out, and 492, about 30 percent, were returned.
That alone was surprising,
Eiswerth said. The survey had about 75 questions along with
maps and graphs. That so many were completed shows that
residents have a tremendous interest in Geneva Lake and
its future, he said.
The survey found Geneva
Lake is an economic engine. It accounts for $321 million
in annual spending and 2,904 jobs.
"That's money that
would not be here if the lake were not in a healthy state,"
said Chuck Ebeling, who was conservancy chairman when the
survey was being done.
Among the surprises is
that almost 88 percent of respondents agreed or strongly
agreed that communities around Geneva Lake need to cooperate
to protect the lake, and about 77 percent agreed or strongly
agreed that a lake management district is a good idea.
Celano said that seeing
a majority of residents in favor a new layer of government
to protect water quality came as surprise.
The watershed still has
tens of thousands of developable acres, Celano said, and
the conservancy is not taking a no-growth attitude, he added.
"What we're saying
is, let's be more intelligent. Let's understand what we're
giving away," he said.
Among problems facing
Geneva Lake is impervious surfaces, such as roads and rooftops,
that come with development and may divert water from the
watershed.
How development happens-as
suburban sprawl or well-designed conservation subdivisions-will
determine the future of Geneva Lake as an economic engine,
Celano said.
Survey details
What: Survey sent out by the UW-Whitewater Fiscal and Economic
Research Center to residents living in the Geneva Lake watershed.
When: September to December
2006.
Who requested: Geneva
Lake Conservancy, a nonprofit lake quality group.
Why: To determine the
economic power of Geneva Lake, and what residents would
do to maintain the lake's current quality of life.
How many: The watershed
has 13,867 taxable properties. Surveys were sent to 1,610
homeowners. Of that, 492 were returned.
Averages:
-- Age of respondents:
54. (Average adult age in Walworth County is 49).
-- Respondent income:
$200,000. (Average county income is $45,000).
How much: Geneva Lake
generates $321 million in annual spending, $57 million in
labor income. There are 2,904 jobs in the regional economy
created by the lake, roughly 15 percent of the total jobs
in Walworth County.
A similar study done
recently on nearby Delavan Lake showed it generates $80
million in spending and 812 jobs annually.
Some responses (questions
paraphrased):
-- A common vision should
be formed through inter-jurisdictional cooperation that
has some influence on development around the lake. Strongly
agree: 62.5 percent. Agree: 25.5 percent. Disagree: 2.3
percent. Strongly disagree: 3.5 percent.
-- A formal lake management
district would serve the interests of the community with
regard to management of the Geneva Lake watershed. Strongly
agree: 46.3 percent. Agree: 30.7 percent. Disagree: 2.3
percent. Strongly disagree: 3.5 percent.
|