|
Thursday,
January 4, 2007
1,230 homes eliminated from Sho-Deen
subdivision plan
By Mike Heine; Gazette staff
DELAVAN
TOWNSHIP-Sho-Deen Construction has shaved 1,230 addresses
from plans for a residential development that included 6,000
housing units when it was first introduced in August 2005.
Updated
plans for Sho-Deen's Jackson Creek development were unveiled
at a town plan commission meeting in December. The plans
now include 3,357 single-family homes and 1,411 multi-family
units on about 2,000 acres surrounding the Delavan Lake
inlet. The plans also show several parks, three schools
and a village center commercial plaza.
Gone
from the plans are a resort hotel or golf course, which
earlier renderings showed surrounding the inlet. That area
will be kept as green space.
Also
gone is a business park on about 60 acres between Interstate
43 and Marsh Road. A road connection to Valencia Drive,
which sparked much opposition from residents living along
the street, was also eliminated, Sho-Deen President David
Patzelt said.
The prices
for the condominiums and houses would range from $180,000
to $600,000 if sold in today's market, Patzelt said. The
development, however, is expected to take 20 years to complete
if it receives approval from the town and county.
"I
support this project," said town Chairman John Pelletier.
"I support keeping it in the town and not letting it
be annexed into the city of Elkhorn or Delavan."
Pelletier
feels it's best to keep development in the township so the
town can benefit from increased tax dollars.
"It's
a question of in whose community does it ultimately wind
up in?" Pelletier said. If it's ever annexed, "We'll
be left with all the headaches without a single opportunity
for a benefit, and I think that's wrong. The town would
be crazy to allow that to happen without doing anything
it can to keep it in the town of Delavan."
Sho-Deen's
property lies roughly between Highway 50, Mound Road, Interstate
43, Highway 67, Theater Road and Town Hall Road, all in
Delavan Township.
Sho-Deen's
plans have been questioned and criticized by both residents
and town officials.
Some
residents worry about strains on the town's infrastructure,
increased traffic, the ability to maintain adequate police
and fire protection, affects on taxes, the number of children
in area schools, groundwater supply, increased pollution
and more use of Delavan Lake.
The size
of the development, which could bring in upward of 11,000
new residents, has frightened many. A petition last summer
contained more than 1,000 signatures of area residents opposing
the development.
The latest
Sho-Deen plans-including renderings of neighborhoods, streets,
schools and commercial areas-will be discussed again at
the Thursday, Jan. 11, plan commission meeting.
Pelletier
expects the meeting will include time for public comments
and questions and a heavy dose of questioning by commission
members. He didn't expect any votes to take place.
While
Sho-Deen rearranged areas for multi-family development,
the proposal calls for 10.5 units per acre. Township planner
Carolyn Esswein, principal at Planning and Design Institute,
favored a density of eight to 10 units per acre.
Another
sticking point could be lot sizes of some of the homes.
County zoning requires 15,000 square feet per lot on standard
zoning. Substandard lots can be 7,500 square feet. About
15 percent of the lots are below 7,500 square feet, Patzelt
said.
"Would
a new zoning category need to be created at the county level
because their design does not fit with any of the current
county zoning options?" Esswein asked.
Patzelt
said the developer and the town will likely never be 100
percent in agreement with the plans, but it's time to move
forward with votes on the concepts. Plans have changed since
their inception and they will continue to change with market
demand as the project rolls along, he added.
"We
have agreed to disagree," on some issues, Patzelt said.
"We've come a long way. I don't want to sound bull-headed
or stuck up, but I think it's unfortunate that some of the
plans have (already) been compromised. But sometimes you
have to move on and work with what you've got.
"We've
been in this process now. It's been well over a year. It's
time that we start getting some decisions."
|