|
Aug.
17, 2006
Editorial:
Preserving observatory
The University of Chicago
has been a good neighbor to the village of Williams Bay
and the other communities surrounding Lake Geneva since
1897, when it opened the now historic Yerkes Observatory.
The massive telescope - now obsolete as a scientific tool
but with some educational value still - drew scientists
from across the world and became in time a national monument
to space exploration. It also became a Wisconsin treasure
and a favorite spot to visit for more than a few families.
It would be a shame if
now, at the end of its ownership of the observatory, the
university tarnished its reputation and legacy in the region.
But that could happen if the university isn't very careful
about what happens to the observatory and the surrounding
land after the school leaves. And village officials need
to be just as careful in deciding whether to grant a zoning
change request to allow development of the site.
At issue is a proposal
under which the university would sell the land to a New
York-based developer that would build a 100-room lakefront
resort and 73 homes on the site. The observatory, and the
30 acres on which it sits, would be donated to the village
of Williams Bay, which, in turn, would create an exposition
district and turn over operation of the 40-inch refracting
telescope to a non-profit operating group.
One can understand the
university's desire to unload the observatory; it costs
about $400,000 to run annually, and selling the site would
generate a hefty profit. Mirbeau Cos. offered $10 million
for its resort plan. Aurora University, which operates a
campus adjacent to the Yerkes property, offered
$4.5 million and a proposal to build 11 homes.
University of Chicago
President Dan Randel has said that the Mirbeau proposal
would meet the school's goals of preserving the observatory,
generating money for research and offering a "high-quality
and environmentally sensitive development." And if
it does that, the proposal is worthy of serious consideration.
But that's the rub. Not
everyone is convinced the project is environmentally sensitive.
The Geneva Lake Conservancy, among others, has raised serious
concerns. "This is really the last natural wooded remnant
on the lake," said Charles Ebeling, chairman of the
group. The group also is concerned, he told us in an e-mail,
that high-density development near the lake "may contribute
to threats to water quality . . . as well as added crowding
on the lake waters and decrease in the quality of life for
those who use the lake."
Citizens at recent public
hearings have raised concerns over the long-term financial
support of Yerkes, which would eventually become the village's
responsibility. The opposition has generated talk of other
proposals and plans for the site.
Village officials would
serve their constituents best by obtaining satisfactory
answers to all of the concerns that have been raised. In
the meantime, university officials may want to take another
look at the Aurora offer. It may not bring them as much
profit, but it may bring them a lot of goodwill.
From the Aug. 18,
2006 editions of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
|