There's
a 300 year old tree, on private property, in Fontana on the
North Shore, that's about to get cut down. The tree is being
removed to build a house, a house that shouldn't have been
allowed in the first place. Just to put it in perspective
the tree was over 100 years old when Chief Big Foot was roaming
the shores of Lake Geneva.
The
good news is the chainsaw hasn't arrived yet, the bad news
is we may be too late.
Oh,
by the way, there's also a boat house being built on this
property, within 35 or so feet of the lake, how does that
happen? My understanding is this boat house is being built
to serve the three residences on the property...really?
OK,
so back to the tree...maybe it's so rotten inside it needs
to come down anyway before it falls and hurts someone, the
problem is we really don't know.
The
land owners are the ones that commissioned an arboriculturist
evaluation. Apparently that report said the tree was in bad
shape. You should see this thing, it's old, massive and until
someone besides the homeowner tells me it needs to come down
I don't believe it. Unfortunately our leaders did.
In
my opinion land owners, especially lake front land owners,
are stewards of the property. Yes they own it and yes they
should be allowed to build, but they shouldn't have the right
to destroy history and nature for the sake of another 1000
square feet of house. There need to be limitations, rules
with teeth, that limit a landowners rights and privileges
within reason. A boat house? Are you kidding? Cutting down
a historic tree without real reason? Unacceptable.
The
message from the Village of Fontana to the land owner should
have been... No you cannot build a boat house, no you cannot
cut down the old tree, yes you may go back to the drawing
board and design a house that fits on the property...simple
right? Problem is we apparently have no limitations or rules
in place in the Village to stop this sort of thing and no
courage to fight the fight and preserve our Village.
The
real problem I have is that the leaders of our community,
the Trustees, have let this happen without much of a fight.
They tell me there's been public hearings on the issue, but
I work for a living. Trustees are elected, by the community,
to preserve and protect us from this sort of unnecessary development.
I respect the Trustees and their willingness to serve the
community, it's a thankless job...but they wanted it.
There shouldn't even need to be a public hearing to stop this
sort of development.
I
admit, I don't know all the facts here, but I shouldn't have
to. The people we elect should.
The
simple truth is the Trustees haven't been looking out for
the best long term interest in the village for years, but
until this tree came along I just shrugged my shoulders like
most people.
Listen,
I started this little tree campaign of mine just this week
because I learned of it's imminent demise. Late? Yes. Right?
For Sure.
At the very least the Village of Fontana should hire an arborist
to inspect the tree, until that happens no one should touch
it.
Here's the last bit I don't quite understand...what mentality
does the land owner have that actually WANTS to cut down a
tree of that magnitude and history? Personally, I'd have a
hard time looking my self in the mirror in my new 15,000 square
foot house.
It's
not all about the tree...
Charlie Harrett