![]() |
|||
|
Autumn
2006 Geneva
Lake Conservancy Board of Directors Grace Eckland Advisory Directors |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
Your Conservancy in Review: July 2005 to July 2006 |
||
![]() |
|||
|
|
The Conservancy's Mai Tai No Tai on
July 15 at the Lake Geneva Country Club was a record-breaking event. The
fund-raiser tremendously outperformed last year's revenue and with 265
people, set an attendance record for any Conservancy event. While attendance is a key factor in
judging the success of the event, the Conservancy also evaluates the revenue,
as fund-raising becomes more critical. "Another reason why this event
was a smash success is we quadrupled last year's income," Pope said.
"I was so surprised, I even had to look up the spelling of the word
'quadrupled!'" Pope attributed the fund-raising success to the fact that "this year we had our act together. The entire team of Sharon O'Brien, staff, volunteers, and I operated like a well-oiled machine," he said. "We took all the lessons learned from past Mai Tai events and acted on them. We also had great donations, underwriting, and auction items. The key, of course, is we received generous support from our guests in the form of attendance and auction participation." The party received strong praise from guests as well. |
|
For example, Joe Falcone of Walworth
said, "This really is one of the best summer parties, if not the
best. They (Conservancy) had a top-notch band and a great dinner and were
successful in creating a really fun vibe. I was impressed at how they
converted the Lake Geneva Country Club into a tropical venue with their
tremendous decorating. I would attend each year just to support the Conservancy,
but I think I speak for all the guests when I say the party stands on
its own merit." A key feature at the event was executive
director Jim Celano's address to the guests. In five minutes he shared
critical items on the Conservancy's radar and highlighted recent accomplishments. "We were unsure whether it was
fair to ask our guest to give us their undivided attention at such a laid-back,
fun-focused event," Celano said. "I was so pleased to see how
truly interested all our guests were in our message. With such important
topics as the sale of Yerkes and large-scale development proposals facing
us, it was great to see a large group intent on absorbing our update."
He hopes guests will spread the word and contact the Conservancy with
questions or offers of support. In conclusion, Pope said, "We exceeded our Mai Tai team's goals of attendance, fund raising, guest enjoyment, Conservancy communication, and 'friend-raising.' While I am sad that my 'party partner' Sharon has stepped down as co-chair for next year, I am pleased that Kelly Hayden-Staggs has agreed to step in for the 2007 Mai Tai on July 14. We hope to see all of you there and thank everyone for their wonderful support." |
|
|
|
I have observed recently some community
leaders acting in a fashion inconsistent with their community's master
plan. This is both unwise and ultimately costly to the community and the
environment. The plan should not be ignored, and the officials' actions
must be discouraged. This complex approach is typically a collaboration of several talented groups working long and hard to examine what makes a good plan for the sustainable use of the land on which we live and work. The plan balances business interests with individual needs, environmental concerns with human activity, and agricultural needs with the need for food and clean, life-sustaining water. The plan establishes the community's capacity to expand. In short, the plan is the map from which all of us can see a course for the future of our community and not lose our way in a disjointed, haphazard, and chaotic free-for-all.
|
|
|
Master plans most certainly have a "freshness" date and do require revisiting as time and activity warrant. However, it must be emphasized that this does not mean throwing the existing plan out the window every time someone has an idea that runs counter to the plan. The whole purpose of the plan is lost along with the wisdom and hard work that went into making the plan if we ignore its core values. If a community leader truly wishes
to balance the needs of his or her constituents with the rights of a property
owner, he or she should remain all the more committed to the master plan.
It forms fair and reasoned expectations from private party to private
party regardless of financial or social status. The plan, established
with the community's blessing, envisions and ensures orderly growth. The
plan is available for all to see by simply visiting your local government
offices. Most importantly, stability to the economic platform of a community
is added by a master plan by presenting clear and unambiguous guidelines
and expectations for safe and orderly investment within that community. There are no secrets here. Just what
a property is zoned is in the plan and/or on a map and in many instances
can be viewed on the Internet from almost anywhere in the world. From
the sophisticated developer to the common homeowner, the community's view
of your property from a land-use perspective is laid out for all to see. If changes are called for, preserving
a balance should remain paramount. If it's the opinion of community leaders
that a greater density of a use in a particular area is called for due
to a significant change in circumstances (natural disaster, severe economic
swings, environmental needs, etc.), then a study of how that change affects
the remaining portion of the community's plan has to be undertaken. If
there are no such overwhelming pressures, aside from the wishes of eager
development interests, nothing more than minor changes should be considered
unless that entity, with the community's blessing, is prepared to balance
the plan by purchasing development rights elsewhere in the community. If the known development capacity of
a parcel of land is not enough for some, the ability to enhance that capacity
is possible but must be weighed against the several other factors previously
mentioned. Questions need to be asked such as: Will this endanger sensitive
lands critical to maintaining a healthy environment and access to clean
and plentiful drinking water? Will this adversely affect neighboring communities
and their established plans? Will this create greater need for more government
services beyond the likely ability of the development to pay for those
services? Above all, your good plan, any good
plan, bears a masterstroke of brilliance if it's allowed to bear fruit.
Adherence to the vision within a plan, if supported and followed through
on and allowed to unfold over time, can and will result in the vision
becoming a beautiful reality and not a nightmare. Creative interpretation is to be encouraged
and not ignored simply because it doesn't fit a |
||
|
|
On August 4, 2006, Congress approved an expansion of the federal conservation tax incentive for conservation easement donations. The new law raises the deduction a landowner can take for donating a conservation easement from 30% of their income in any year to 50%; allows qualifying farmers and ranchers to deduct up to 100% of their income and extends the carry-forward period for a donor to take tax deductions for a voluntary conservation agreement from 5 to 15 years. To find out more, visit the Land Trust Alliance |
|
A year ago at the annual meeting I reviewed the preceding 12 months, as I'll do now. There have been many achievements, initiatives, issues, and what I'll call opportunities over the past year's march to advance conservation in southern Walworth County and in particular through the Geneva Lake watershed area. We'll be talking increasingly
about our area in terms of the word "watershed," but suffice
it to say a watershed embraces all the land that drains toward a common
area, and in our case locally that is the great ancient pre-glacial
valley we call Geneva Lake. There is a deep geographic common ground
between all the nearby lands that drain into and out of Geneva Lake. And that common ground applies to the future of the people who live and recreate on the land. Because what we do with our woods, ponds, and wetlands; with our wells and septic and water treatment systems; with our lawns and farm fields; with private and commercial run-off management; with new residential and commercial development and construction will affect the underground aquifers that feed our lake and undergird our watershed that interconnect with the lake and flow into the White River and down the Fox. |
||
|
These effects, many of which will
be determined by large and small decisions by our citizens and the multiple
municipalities in which we live, will strongly influence the quality
of life, our local land values, the desirability of living and working
here, the vitality of our deep lake itself, and the very life and health
of all living things in our watershed, now and for future generations.
That is our real natural common ground, and these are the issues that
animate the Conservancy. They are the issues that should become a priority
in our communities - before damage to the natural environment becomes
irreversible and the costs of recovery overwhelming. So back to the past 12 months. I
must say this period begins and ends with deep concerns about the near
and ultimate fate of the very place in which we sit today, Yerkes
Observatory. Twelve months ago there just was a meeting next
door at Aurora University of some 70 citizens concerned about the future
of Yerkes. They were led by Larry Larkin and included our state senator,
Neal Kedzie, who is with us today. The community-based initiative to
save this national monument for the 21st century, called Yerkes 21,
was launched that day. That initiative later was merged into the proposal
by Aurora University to save Yerkes and its native grounds. |
||
|
Today, a year later, Aurora's response to the University of Chicago's Request for Proposal apparently has been rejected by the university, while the competing plan has been accepted. It is by a shopping-mall developer and owner of Mirbeau Resorts in upstate New York to build an imposing commercial structure containing a 100-room resort spa hotel, restaurant, and conference center on the lakefront and 72 homes near the observatory. The observatory itself would be protected for five years, but no firm plans for its long-term preservation and utilization are known yet. The Mirbeau proposal will be subject
to approvals of zoning changes, complex and costly tax and financial
structuring, and specific plans presented to the Village of Williams
Bay government. The presentation of Mirbeau's plan and public Q&As
on these issues have been scheduled over the coming weeks. A group called
the Concerned Taxpayers
of Williams Bay, which I'm sure includes some of our 115-plus
Conservancy supporters with Williams Bay addresses, has been formed
and will be critiquing the proposals. I guarantee you the Conservancy
will join in with questions, observations, and ideas to share with its
own membership, the people of Williams Bay, and the entire Geneva Lake
network of communities in the weeks, months, and possibly even years
ahead. We'll talk with the experts and the public, analyze the plans
and their implications, and focus our commentary on the many issues
about historic preservation and land conservation that arise. An observation I share with others
is that the determination of Yerkes Observatory and its site is not
only a question of the future for this particular unique and threatened
human-made and special natural place. Yerkes is a "watershed"
issue for our entire area because the results and implications will
affect the common ground and future direction of many other dimensions
of our community life throughout this geographic watershed. Call Yerkes
a bellwether or a turning point on community character, or just call
it important. But issues surrounding Yerkes, important
as they are, and which we can discuss at more length later this morning,
aren't the only highlights of Conservancy activity of the past year.
As a disclaimer, I won't try to be comprehensive, since there's just
too much going on. Anything I overlook or get wrong in this report is
my fault, not that of the staff or board. Twenty months ago we launched a development
initiative to focus a lot of effort and resources on the growing pressures
for suburban subdivision expansion throughout our area. We agreed that
Conservancy members are not blatantly anti-development. Good development
can carry real economic and even social benefits if carefully planned
in context with overall community vision and local consideration. We
decided to focus on what we could do to educate, cajole, confer, and
strive for BETTER development - development sensitive to density considerations
and to proven conservation practices. Executive director Jim Celano, staff,
and board members since have met often with developers and builders;
municipal, county, state, and even federal officials at every level;
other conservation and community organizations; and with private citizens,
and we've made progress. Any wins we've had usually have been combined
efforts, and we don't begin to take sole credit. They are wins for and
by the community. For example, the City of Lake Geneva
Plan Commission heard from the Conservancy and many others and rejected
plans for what has been referred to as Geneva Ridge, off the southeast
corner of the lake. The commission acted even after the plans were scaled
back and notably reformatted, largely at the encouragement of the Conservancy.
Or, Jim met with the Sho-Deen group
and shared our conservation concerns about the proposal for the Big
Foot Farms subdivision in Walworth Township south of the Geneva
Lake. The Village of Walworth Plan Commission grabbed the bull by the
horns and made it clear to Sho-Deen the dense development proposal was
inappropriate to the site and did not fit into Walworth's well-reasoned
and up-to-date master plans for the future growth of the community.
And, Jim has been an outspoken advocate for broad evaluation of the effects on the area as well as the local community of the massive Jackson Creek residential development proposal by Sho-Deen east of Delavan Lake. |
||
|
On another front, recognizing that
conservation development design can be responsible and farsighted, the
board authorized creation of our Excellence
in Conservation Development Award and presented it to Keefe
& Associates and its affiliated Red Wing Land Company for their
Sugar Creek Preserve conservation community. Located on Bowers Road
south of I-43, Sugar Creek offers 52 homesites on 260 acres of woods,
streams, ponds, and wetlands, all designed by famed conservation planner
Russell Arndt. We publicized this new award to send a signal to other
developers that good conservation design can be successful and gain
positive recognition from both the community and the market. For six months we've been involved with the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater in our initiative to evaluate the economic impact that the health of Geneva Lake has on the economic vitality of the surrounding communities. This important baseline research is about to be conducted. We think this program will draw increased attention to the practical value of conservation practices in our community. Click here for the economic survey. |
||
![]() |
Regarding the agricultural community and our fast-disappearing prime agricultural land, last summer we took an exhibit at the Walworth County Fair to reach out to the agricultural community and other new friends. Jim has met with several agricultural officials, and we are looking into both governmental and private means to accelerate agricultural land conservation, both to help keep prime farmland in farming and to help maintain a measure of the casual country and rustic character of much of our area. We have continued to expand our portfolio of protected lands in southern Walworth County. Current conservation easements and those on the drawing boards soon will add up to about 1,000 acres of permanently protected lands. Voluntary donations to the Conservancy, which carry along with them the responsibility of permanent land stewardship, are from private landowners and municipal officials alike, all of whom make this achievement possible.Did you know that nationally nearly 10 million acres are protected by regional and local land trusts like the Conservancy? That's four times the size of Yellowstone National Park and represents double the land protected just eight years ago.
|
|
|
Land trusts are the vanguard of land protection in the 21st century now that deficits have limited the ability of the federal government to conserve new lands. Current rates of development mean we have 20 years or less to protect our best natural landscapes before they are gone forever. Walworth County is one of the fastest-developing areas in Wisconsin, and a corollary issue is that prime farmland is being converted to other uses at an alarming rate. Shifting gears to a positive note, we've enjoyed over the past year several great get-togethers with the community that also have been critical fundraisers for us. From a fun Mai Tai No Tai party at Lake Geneva Yacht Club last July to our sellout upcoming 3rd annual No Tai party at Lake Geneva Country Club on July 15. |
![]() |
|
|
We continued the Holly Ball tradition with another great event at the Big Foot Country Club last December. At the event Bill Peterson was singled out for our annual Conservation Stewardship Award for his unrelenting efforts to preserve the historic Black Point Estate, where we have a shoreline conservation land protection agreement. Just this June we held a Farmers Market and Garage Sale at the Mill House, followed a few weeks later by a Sunday brunch and tour fundraiser at the Driehaus Estate. If you've missed these events, please join us in the future. Lynn Ketterhagen, our staff land
protection specialist, has made great progress in updating one of the
key documents associated with each of our local conservation easements,
called baseline documentation, to bring these in line with current national
standards. We've become more sophisticated and educated in learning
how to best assure the long-term, permanent protection of these lands.
Lynn hopes to have this documentation completed and in the hands of
all our easement landowners by this fall. Regarding the Conservancy and the
news media, we have received excellent coverage of issues and initiatives
in the local press and credit it for adding power to our public information
outreach. In addition to working closely with the Lake Geneva Regional
News, The Beacon, The Janesville Gazette, At the Lake magazine, and
others, this past year we have met with the editorial board of The Milwaukee
Journal Sentinel and liaised with the news and editorial sections of
the Chicago Tribune, Kenosha News, and other key media to inform people
about conservation issues. In the office, Katie Sullivan, our
administrator, has revamped the Web site and our newsletter, assuring
they are full of current news and valuable information. We have installed
new computers and upgraded and updated our software and records systems. There's a lot on our agenda, now and looking ahead. But, none of our work would be possible without our small but great staff led by Jim, without our active and involved officers and all our board members, or without our many Conservancy members, volunteers, and donors. A big thank you to all. At the Conservancy we try to live by our motto: "Common ground. Community character. Natural Resources." We are always on the outlook for new supporters who can donate their time or money and even prospective board members, so if you know people who may be interested in learning more, please put them in touch with us. |
||
|
|
Phil Harvey, a local
historian with a long-time presence in Fontana, was presented with the
Conservancy Founder's Society Recognition of Excellence at the Board
of Directors annual meeting. As he prepares to return to New Hampshire
to a special home he helped restore, the Conservancy acknowledged and
thanked Phil for his continued generosity and heartening presence in
our lives. Phil's support of the
Conservancy began in 1998, and in 2000 he generously created a unique
opportunity that allowed the Conservancy to purchase his home, the restored
Mill House in Fontana. Phil has remained an active Conservancy member,
often helping around the Mill House and supporting us in many ways.
Phil and his late wife
Jean returned to the Fontana area in 1981 to buy and restore the Mill
House, which had been in Jean's family for generations. Our offices
are in this 164-year-old building, surrounded by the charm and loving
care Phil and Jean put into the house. Phil always has been
eager to share with the community his love for this distinctive home.
The Mill House supposedly was built in 1857, although Phil recently
discovered information that could date the building to as early as 1842.
The massive stove-wood structure is one of only two surviving examples
of such construction in the entire Midwest and is listed on the National
Register of Historic Places. The Conservancy Board
and staff express their deep appreciation to Phil for his esteemed friendship
and support, which have aided our mission of promoting responsible stewardship
of our land and water resources. |
|
The Conservancy, in collaboration
with the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater Fiscal and Economic Resource
Center, has launched a study of the economic impact Geneva Lake has
on the local and regional economies. Taking a cue from a similar study
conducted a few years ago for Delavan Lake, we are asking more than
1,600 residents located in and around the Geneva Lake watershed a series
of questions aimed at finding out what the lake means to a cross section
of area residents. As development pressures mount on the lake, the open
lands, and historic sites throughout the area, we are looking for a
guidepost as to what the likely consequences are from all that is associated
with this activity. If you have received the survey,
be sure to fill it out and return it to the university. If someone you
know has received this survey, encourage him or her to do the same. A comprehensive analysis of the returned surveys is scheduled to begin in late September and will be completed sometime in October. Once finished, the Conservancy will announce the findings in November. As plans are developed further, we will update you on when and where you can join us to hear the results. The survey is available here to all those interested. |
| Databases,
information signs and gardens, oh my! Life at the Mill House proceeds
at its normal frenetic pace, and this time we are taking our members along
for the ride.
"Computers and men are not species of the same genus . . . . [Computers] must always be an intelligence alien to genuine human problems and concerns." Joseph Weizenbaum Or, in my own words, the computer is possessed and doesn't really like me. One bright, cold day in early 2006 my computer database decided to self-combust and took much of our donor records with it. Although I managed to resurrect the data, it had one interesting side effect: The database had duplicated itself! |
||
![]() |
In to save the day was Gwen Ferrari,
our newest volunteer. Over the last three months Gwen has been cleaning
up the database and erasing the duplicates. She has been instrumental
in preparing the databases for the data transfer in late fall to a database
that is more efficient and more appropriate for a not-for-profit. To facilitate the transfer, we are
asking all our members to fill out the form included in this newsletter.
It is our goal to communicate with all our members in the best way;
this represents a significant advance to our becoming a more member-driven
organization. We are asking for contact information so that we may reach
all our members in the most efficient manner - be it phone, email or
regular mail. We need feedback from all our constituents to find the
right balance of advocacy, land protection, and education. With it,
the board of directors can make better decisions, thus ensuring the
future of the organization.
|
|
|
Another form of communication we continually seek is feedback from our members. To accomplish this, the Conservancy sends out mailings about GLC activities to update members. They are encouraged to call in and provide feedback. These outreach attempts are not fund-raising requests; they are simply an opportunity for increased communication. Please feel free to call, e-mail, or stop by at anytime with thoughts and ideas no matter how trivial. Someone should be here to help you between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday-Friday |
||
|
"Collecting data is only the first step toward wisdom, but sharing data is the first step toward community." Henry Louis Gates Jr. "Esker! Esker! Read All About It!" announces the masthead above the information sign recently installed in front of the Mill House. As part of the Conservancy's 2005 grant request from the Lake Geneva Garden Club, the information sign is our way of reaching out to the community, letting everyone know we are here and giving passersby a window into the Conservancy when they may not have time to amble up our brick walk and say hello. Of course, the first person to take some time to amble and tell us what "esker" means wins a prize! "I have a rock garden. Last
week three of them died." Richard Diran Whether it is to voice your opinion, ask a question, or simply enjoy our lovely office, we encourage all of you to stop by the Mill House. We at the Conservancy work to protect our beloved Geneva Lake and its surrounding watershed, and we need your voices to help lead us. With contributions from Charles Colman, GLC vice chairman and Fund-Raising Committee chairman, and Lynn Ketterhagen, Land Protection Specialist. |
Esker! Esker! Read All About It! |
|
|
Please help us save a phone call to you. Click here to open another browser page with the Member Update Form. We'd really appreciate it! |
|
|
Riding lawn mower
Do you really want Lynn to sweat it out by pushing that tiny lawn mower through the Conservancy Jungle? Won't someone please help her out? ![]() |